income from business operation due to the high interest rate of 14-15 percent per year according to the loan contract. Such facts caused the GL financial statements to be in contravention of Section 56 of
offences under Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2, Section 307, Section 308, Section 311, Section 312 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 83
Information Transmission System. Such misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which was effective at the
learned of such facts from his positions at SLC.His actions were deemed using inside information to gain unfair benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act
action by placing trading orders through other persons? trading accounts and making payment for such transactions.Swake?s action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535
in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the criminal fining
their trading accounts and facilitating financial transactions via the accounts.{A}'s action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); while {B} and {C}'s
cases where service providers exchange digital assets in a manner that constitutes operating a business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018) without a
Court ruled against him for violating Sections 243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code regarding METRO and TUCC shares. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2