-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on the
Director-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on
business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court
result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the
offer for NMG takeover. As a result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The
qualified to be a listed company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Their divided duties were meticulously planned beginning with Mr. Boonpiam becoming a director in ADAM; Board of Directors signed an
qualified to be a listed company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Their divided duties were meticulously planned beginning with Mr. Chinnavat becoming a director in ADAM; Board of Directors signed an
-pledging scheme and Kitha was not qualified to be a listed company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Their divided duties were meticulously planned, Mr. Sarawuthi involved in voting for ADAM to buy Kitha’s