deemed to be the operation of a digital asset dealer without a license. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official DAB Act S.26 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official
provided for Exmix's offence. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. DAB Act S.94 in conjunction with 26 and 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry
preparing, approving, and supervising advertisements. In particular, Bitazza's advertisement review process was inadequate. As a result, advertisements published during this period contained contents
deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine
deemed a dishonest act and caused damage to GGC at the total value of 2,157 million Baht. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 312 and 281/2 paragraph 2 in
distillation. That was deemed a dishonest act and caused damage to GGC at the total value of 2,157 million Baht. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 312 315 in
deemed a dishonest act and caused damage to GGC at the total value of 2,157 million Baht. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 312 315 in conjunction with 86