Phra Khanong District Court regarding investment contracts under the Land Banking Investment Fund Agreement, with a total claim value of approximately 190 million baht, and (2) an arbitration dispute in

of debenture without approval in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); meanwhile, Ornpaphat and Kanyakorn

-public facts that influenced the securities price. His act was liable to the offences under Section 241 and the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA

was a securities purchase that took advantage of a material, non-public fact that influenced the securities price, which was deemed an exploitation of third parties and liable to the offences under

derivatives business without obtaining license or registration from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 of  an imprisonment up to

details of cash flow were as follows: 2.1.1 Cash and cash equivalent of Bt2,530.6 million which cash flow summarized for the first six months of 2017 were below ;- - The Group’s net cash from operation was

31, 2016. The important details of cash flow were as follows: 2.1.1 Cash and cash equivalent of Bt2,094.9 million which cash flow summarized for the nine months of 2017 were below ;- - The Group’s net

suppliers and contractors for the same. The ordering of the gear was under process with a lead time of 14 months offered from the supplier. However, with quick actioning of the contingency plan by the

parties 124 1,239 90% Accrued interest expenses 137 132 (4%) Current portion of liabilities under rehabilitation plan 173 180 4% Provision 0 41 100% Other current liabilities 19 31 39% Total current

margin had accounted for the fair value adjustment of the acquired business according to the accounting standards under WHA level. However, the genuine gross margin during 3 months and 6 months ended the