prices were within the range which the client previously expressed interest in. She thought that the shares could be sold to take profit in the similar manner as the client's purchase made in the morning

were persuaded to make an investment at the minimum amount of 100,000 baht to earn 5 percent return in six months.Both companies promised to repay the principal and generate the guaranteed returns

agreed to or colluded with five other persons to use several trading accounts to trade YCI shares in concealment and on a continuous basis to mislead the public into believing that YCI shares were traded

both accounting periods, as the financial statements were not in conformity with the generally accepted accounting standards in these following items:1.  YNP?s records on the allowance for doubtful

? accounts that he borrowed the money from, for other?s or his own benefits. The SEC reviewed and found that Chalerm?s actions were deemed fraudulent, deceitful, interference with clients? assets with the

, for the benefit of his own or others, also transferred the client?s deposits placed with the company to the accounts of other clients that he was allowed to use. Chalerm?s actions were deemed dishonesty

delist KARAT from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), before the information was disclosed to the public on July 3, 2002.  The SEC found that some accounts were opened to trade KARAT?s shares only while

addition to him, Chanchai and Onpimon were also involved in the act as aiders.In this regard, Chupong, Chanchai and Onpimon were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of

. By committing such act which gained him more than 42 million baht in benefits, {A} was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In addition to him, {B} and {C} were also involved in the act as

scheme, {F} and three other persons who entered the settlement procedure on January 22, 2014 aided or abetted the aforesaid actions by allowing others to use their trading accounts.Their actions were in