penalties under Section 296 of the said Act. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed on him respective fines of 685,785.60 baht and 500,000 baht, totaling at 1,185,785.60 baht. # # #   

operating activities of BLISS. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 238 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine on him in the amount

same Act. As Paiboon agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a 6,028,563.75 baht fine on him.Vasant Thienhom, Deputy Secretary-General said, ?In cases where a

Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and Section 83 of the Penal Code. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed fines on them in the amounts of 36,815,524.26 baht, 500,000

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a fine on him in the amount of 48,127,389.54 baht. As aider and abettor,  Pathaipoom and Chalalai were deemed to

statement for the year 2020 and those financial report within the period specified by the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board. The inquiry official sent the case back to the Settlement

to the Settlement Committee. SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with 56(2)(4) Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 08/12/2022

the beneficial owner of Miss Karuna Kaewmanee’s securities trading accounts and five other persons who agreed to enter the settlement, to trade shares of Union Petrochemical Public Company Limited (UKEM

unknown person who was the beneficial owner of Miss Karuna Kaewmanee’s securities trading accounts and five other persons who agreed to enter the settlement, to trade shares of Union Petrochemical Public

Assets in which the Provident Fund may invest or have in Possession (Repealed) ​ Appointment of the Settlement Committee under the Provident Fund Act B.E. 2530(Repealed)  Appointment of the https