containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the

business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court

result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the

offer for NMG takeover. As a result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The

result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the

collateral. Furthermore, BAY failed to monitor and oversee the collateral while it was under its care. Such actions constitute a violation of Section 300 in conjunction with Section 46, which is subject to

. The activities were liable to violate Section 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties

of Mr. Prakorn Makjumroen constituted offences under Section 312 and Section 281/2, Paragraph 2, in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 89/24 of the Securities

The Constitutional Court has passed a unanimous ruling that the presumption of persons having known or possessed the inside information under Section 243 and Section 244 of the Securities and

, and securities depository center in accordance with Section 206 and Section 222 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).* The Meeting also approved the principles for amending the