approval from the SEC was in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Criminal Fining Committee therefore has
addition to him, Chanchai and Onpimon were also involved in the act as aiders.In this regard, Chupong, Chanchai and Onpimon were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of
aiders. In this regard, {A}, {B} and {C} were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed
AGM. According to the consideration of the Department of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon?s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public
operating digital asset business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018) without license in contravention of Section 26, subject to penalties under Section 66 of
prepared incorrect accounts with intention to deceive others about those fraudulent actions, violated Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and
of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon’s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public Companies Act of 1992, which do not give chairman of
of Securities Companies _____________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 103 (4) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551
Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor/Nor/Khor. 26/2551 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Being Executive of Securities Companies _____________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 103 (4) of