) for falsifying the company?s documents and accounts in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The SEC?s finding indicated that Somchit proceeded or permitted

Sections 307, 308, 311, 312, 313 and 315 of the SEA as well as a violation of Section 89/7 liable to the penalty under Section 281/2 of the same Act, as the case may be.  Any person against whom the SEC

cases, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the

FOCUS share price. Her jail term, however, was suspended for two years.Yesterday (October 31, 2012), the Criminal Court ruled against two share price manipulators for violating Section 243(1), (2) in

business without license or registration with the SEC in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) and thus liable under Section 125 of the same Act to imprisonment for a term not

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (DA). Under Section 289 of the SEA, the said violation was subject to an imprisonment from 2-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both

baht had already been fully spent, and the four persons played a role in the company’s disclosure of such information. The act of STARK is considered a contravention of Section 204 of the Securities and

with Section 83 of the Penal Code and Section 315 of the SEA (as the case may be). Moreover, Vijchu’s acts in particular, are deemed failure to perform duties as a private fund manager with honesty and

securities investment records and income statement. His wrongdoings were in violation of Clause 2 of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Sections 89/7, 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the SEA. With his confession

Supaporn Lapvisutisin, former Executive Vice President of Picnic Corporation Plc. ("PICNI") and 22 associates, and sentenced Theeratchanon and Supaporn to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and