Commission inquiring about the conditions, rules, and fees for applying a digital asset exchange license. The aforementioned actions by CoinEx and Mr. Puttipong are deemed to be conducting digital asset

Exchanges Commission inquiring about the conditions, rules, and fees for applying a digital asset exchange license. The aforementioned actions by CoinEx and Mr. Puttipong are deemed to be conducting digital

.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the

case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the

licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. This case is in the process

the interests of the bondholders. However, Mr. Chalanatee failed to give the necessary directives or to take actions required of him. Mr. Cholnatee is therefore responsible for the misconduct arising

taking the following actions: (a) collecting and allocating the client’s assets to the client ; (b) transferring the client asset account and the client’s assets to another intermediary ; (c) closing the

taking the following actions: (a) collecting and allocating the client’s assets to the client; (b) transferring the client asset account and the client’s assets to another intermediary; (c) closing the

taking the following actions: (a) collecting and allocating the client’s assets to the client; (b) transferring the client asset account and the client’s assets to another intermediary; (c) closing the

18/12/2009 company is licensed to operate derivatives business. Later, the company took possession of the deceived investors’ assets. Such actions were deemed to be a public frauds under Section 343 of