=searchcontent_th~5^10000&ps=2&mm=100&qf=title_th_default&fq=system_name%3AEnforcement&start=20&rows=10 21 - 30 of 205 results Sort by: Relevance Date (Newest) Date (Oldest) Settlement Committee Order No. 1/2023

^10000&ps=2&mm=100&qf=title_th_default&fq=system_name%3AEnforcement&start=20&rows=10 21 - 30 of 195 results Sort by: Relevance Date (Newest) Date (Oldest) Settlement Committee Order No. 1/2023 Dated 24/04

or giving any advice to the client, he signed such selling order form in the capacity of an investment consultant. In addition, he neither examined the transaction nor requested for additional

securities as well as rules on securities borrowing and lending, investment analysis and giving advice, submissions of clients? transaction confirmations, service in high risk or complex financial products and

a selling order for the securities in such account. It was found that prior to the transaction, {A} had learnt of the identity of the securities' beneficial owner who was not the account owner

Transaction amount USD 7,241 approximately Baht 246,908.69 Pricing policy At Book Value and near market value Payment term By cash with 60 days of credit term The reason In order to support for factory

credit term The reason In order to reduce outstanding of unused equipments and create maximum benefits for the Company and its subsidiary, CCTP sold unused equipments to XYZ-Netherlands. 2nd transaction

THB 130 million and interest. In addition, this loan is considered a connected transaction as GSC and ACAP have the same directors.  However, GSC did not seek approval from the shareholders in

, both the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee view that such transaction is reasonable and beneficial to the company. However, the independent financial advisor is of the opinion that the

), the shareholders should not  ratify this transaction because the agreement contains a condition  requiring GSTEL to appoint the Mahachai Group as its sole sales distributor for a period of five years