the ZipUp+ program, while the SEC was collecting and examining facts related to the business operation of Zipmex.   Following the collection and examination of the facts aforementioned, the Competent

}. However, after fact examination, it was found that there was a reasonable ground to believe that the actual payment for the purchase of the land and the office building was 40 million baht, and the

working for Asia Plus Securities Co., Ltd. at the time of misconduct.Following the inspection report submitted by Asia Plus Securities and the subsequent examination conducted by the SEC, it was found that

trading decisions for the client. From examination of communications records, there was no sources of the orders; just transaction confirmations made by such investment consultant and the conversations

for such trading was made from the client account by {A} without the knowledge of the client.The {B} case was also lodged by an investor. The SEC's finding from an examination of conversation records

; assets to SEC with information that did not align with the facts found by the SEC's examination. This resulted in the consideration that Mr. Akalarp committed or permitted Zipmex Thailand to make

million to THB 333.40 million or decreased THB 30.19 million or 8.30% due to the revenue of films’ rights distribution decreased. Cost of Production and Service / Expense of Sale and Management 1. Cost of

the same period last year due to the increased of machine repairing expense and legal & other consulting fees. In addition, the company has recognized doubtful account increased amount of 241.80million

in subsidiary - (25) 25 100.00 Loss on exchange rates (4,456) (2,971) (1,485) 49.98 Profit (loss) before finance cost and income tax expense 5,403 (4,952) 10,355 209.11 Finance cost (2,962) (485

decreased from THB 78.13 million to 42.29 million or decreased THB 35.84 million or 45.87% because there were less movies exhibition in the theatre than last year. 2. Selling and Service’s Expense Selling and