gross profit and administrative expense control. EBITDA margin in the 4Q’18 and year 2018 was 26% and 25% respectively. However, the administrative expenses included the non-cash expense incurring from

comparing to Q4/2018 loss of Baht 143 million due to higher utilization rate as well as tight costs and expenses control.  EBITDA in Q1/2019 was Baht 9 million, a decline of 88% YoY but an 107% upturn QoQ

and international demand, which affected from the impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The measures of the government sector to control the spread of the virus, therefore the limit of inbound and

own clients. It also aims to ensure that the clients have work systems in place to control and monitor compliance with the relevant regulations;   (2) To require that securities companies put in place

. Information on trading of derivative instruments from the Stock Exchange: Investors who trade derivative instrument on the secondary market. Information on daily trading, deposits, transfers, withdrawals

government measures to control the epidemic situation of COVID– 19. Consequently, the customers change the method of work, resulting in delays in delivery or inspection of equipment or operations. As the

able to achieve higher collection efficiency and cost control management.  The Company purchased bad debt from financial institution in Q1/2018 1,017 million Baht.  The Company’s Interest Bearing Debt

decreased of food’s promotion expenses due to efficiency control. Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses of Q2’2018 was Baht 525 million, decreased by 2.5% or Baht 13 million from Q2’2017, mainly

control policy. This resulted in decrease in office expenses and staff cost. Finance costs The company had a small decrease in finance costs for the solar energy unit Baht (1 .1 2 ) million or (7.7%) . It

which Warot and Jeeraporn were working. They used such inside information to trade securities or derivatives of 12 listed company clients during 2015-2017. Most of such draft financial statements