Exchange Commission No. Kor Thor. 9/2556 Re: Segregation and Management of Client’s Assets In Case of Intermediary Being under Receivership by Court Order _____________________________ By virtue of Section 9
activities are liable to be an operation of digital asset exchange business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree, for which XT .COM has not obtained a license, in violation of Section 26, and subject to
financial statements and deceitful acts towards the public under Section 312, Section 89/7 in conjunction with Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 and Section 306 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992
operating the digital asset dealer business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses without license in violation of Section 26 and subject to the penalties under Section 66 of the
? 23 July 2014 before the company disclosed the Q2 operating results via the SET. Assavin?s offence was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) and liable to the
failure to comply with the SEC?s order, the company and its responsible management are liable to violation of Section 58 (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) with penalties under Section
. (FOCUS) share price during April 24-25, 2008. His offense is in violation of Section 243 (1), Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 in conjunction with Section 86 of the
normal market condition became affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013.Such offences were in violation of Section 243 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83