order within the specified period. Moreover, despite being warned by the Competent Officer, they provided only partial, incomplete information and showed a delaying behavior in not providing the requested
business thoroughly, causing incomplete disclosure in the filing concerning risk factors, conflict of interests, and trade mark.Akekajak?s actions were considered as failure to comply with the SEC Office
that the applicant had transferred all shares of such company to a third party despite various factors indicating that the transaction may not exist. This would lead to incorrect and incomplete
having been settled the case with a fine for such offence; (d) having been pending under charge or criminal proceeding by competent authorities for the offence under (c). (5) directors, managers and any
to suspect that the material information disclosed to the general public is incomplete or inadequate to support the investment decision making, or misleading; (6) the applicant does not default on a
revoked: O yes O however, such case has already been granted exemption by the SEC; O pending application for exemption from SEC; O other cases (please specify)…………………………………. O no 6.4 Being a director
with managing power of a financial institution whose license has been revoked: O yes O however, such case has already been granted exemption by the SEC; O pending application for exemption from SEC; O
methods: (a) Disclose only the essences of the policy and guidelines and the full version thereof on the Company’s website; (b) In the case where the Company has incomplete information, for example, no
version thereof on the Company’s website; (b) In the case where the Company has incomplete information, for example, no policy or guidelines or operating results in various areas in the “Business