, which may lead to imprisonment from 5 to 10 years and a double fine based on the asset value or the benefit received from violation of such sections, as the case may be, but in any case not less than

management of a fund by increasing from 20% to 100% the proportion of the fund's assets that can be sub-managed by a manager that is not regulated by a signatory.The revised Framework took effect on 23

be careful and examine their trading transactions as well as the money in their accounts regularly, and not to allow investment consultants to make investment decisions or use investors? trading

.2535 (1992) and may be found to have committed an offence under Section 281/2 of the same act, in which case, the SEC will not hesitate to take action pursuant to its authority and mandate.According

enroll employees in the provident fund, providing the default portfolio for a member who does not make a selection, and specifying the details of accounting and recording of fund incomes and expenses; 3

. In pursuing the goal to promote women’s roles in the Thai capital market, the IOD’s “Women on Boards” program will not only help enhance women’s knowledge and skills to be in readiness for professional

. Hence, if the public sector did not come in to regulate, it would be possible for frauds, scams or unfair activities to arise and consequently damage the trading confidence and investors themselves

Civil Court to seek an imposition of sanctions with the applicable statutory maximum penalties, which shall not be lower than the penalties specified by the CSC.In all cases, the civil fines and the

the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA, i.e., up to two years? imprisonment or a fine not exceeding twice the amount of the benefits received or should have been received but in any case no less

applicant has withdrawn the IPO filing and has not conducted any public offering. In addition, the IFA report in this case has been revised according to the latest updated information.