, and using inside information for trading Roynet shares in violation of Section 300 with Section 56, Sections 59, 238, 241, 246 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The

failure to comply with the SEC?s order, the company and its responsible management are liable to violation of Section 58 (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) with penalties under Section

and Clause 4(3) of the Notification of the Securities and Exchange Commission No. Kor Jor 8/2553 Re: Determination of the Untrusthworthy Characteristics of Company Directors and Executives dated 23

Socatiyanurak, SEC Secretary-General said that the SEC hosted ?Modern business, attentive and ready for any situation?, the first ?SEC for CEO Forum? in 2017 to strengthen cooperation and exchange experience and

twice a year and each authority will take turns hosting the event.  The next meeting will be hosted by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Cambodia,? Vorapol added.

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The findings previously led to the sanctions imposed on ING Funds, Maris and Burim. In this connection, the SEC further probed into the case and found that from January 5

Bangkok, September 10, 2013 ? The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Association of Investment Management Companies (AIMC) agree on introducing investment risk management guideline and

documents. The SEC, therefore, considers the tender offeror has not yet submitted the tender offer in accordance with Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. Earlier, the SEC received

loss. Their actions were in violation of Section 241, subject to sanctions under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). On June 18, 2014, Yongyuth and Vorapin agreed to enter

construction projects, despite the fact that the services did not exist, with intent to deceive other persons. The said action was in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992