following prohibited characteristics: (1) Being a bankrupt; (2) Having been imprisoned by a final court judgment for an offense relating to property committed with dishonest intent; (3) Having been an
administrative expenses in Q4’17 (e.g. provision for Kenya court case, expenses related to company’s reorganization). Selling and distribution expenses declined by -1.2% YoY as well as slightly lower advertising
Province Court, and the company was called as a co-defendant. Later, on 27 May 2019, entered into a compromise agreement, which the court has ordered according to the aforementioned compromise agreement, as
leading to the entrance of Hatairat 54 alley which is the location of the land. The dispute is on the stage of verdict of Supreme Court resulting that the Company cannot start developing the land due to the
company was sued as black case no. Por 1430/2561 to Samut Sakhon Province Court, and the company was called as a co-defendant. Later, on 27 May 2019, entered into a compromise agreement, which the court has
, 2018, in a black case number Por.158/2561, the case of Taling Chan Provincial Court, in which the court made an appointment to hear the verdict on March 6, 2020 As a result, the Transaction is: A. not
82.1 million and Baht 106.1 million, which represent 6.4% and 7.8% to sales and service income, respectively. The increasing in administrative expenses derived from the court fee amount of Baht 10.7
, Bangkok 10310 with aggregate area of 11-00-1 Rai Asset Item 2: Sport Court (opened-air), situated on some parts of the land described in Asset Item 1. 4. Basis to Determine the Value of Consideration
value adjustment of investment due to reclassification in the amount of Baht 2,030 Million, net of corporate income tax. 4. On September 21, 2018, the Supreme Administrative Court rendered the judgement