result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the

collateral. Furthermore, BAY failed to monitor and oversee the collateral while it was under its care. Such actions constitute a violation of Section 300 in conjunction with Section 46, which is subject to

penalty under Section 300 in conjunction with Section 278 and Section 302/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (the “Securities and Exchange Act”). This case is in the process of inquiry by the

. The activities were liable to violate Section 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties

of Mr. Prakorn Makjumroen constituted offences under Section 312 and Section 281/2, Paragraph 2, in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 89/24 of the Securities

The Constitutional Court has passed a unanimous ruling that the presumption of persons having known or possessed the inside information under Section 243 and Section 244 of the Securities and

, and securities depository center in accordance with Section 206 and Section 222 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).* The Meeting also approved the principles for amending the

approval from the SEC was in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Criminal Fining Committee therefore has

addition to him, Chanchai and Onpimon were also involved in the act as aiders.In this regard, Chupong, Chanchai and Onpimon were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of

aiders. In this regard, {A}, {B} and {C} were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed