Following the earlier public hearing in late March, where the majority of business providers had expressed their approvals towards the guideline suggested by SEC. Therefore, SEC had then proposed a

Following the earlier public hearing in late March, most business providers had expressed their approvals towards the guideline suggested by SEC. Therefore, SEC had then proposed a draft regulation

that at this stage, the SEC and the public prosecutor will study the Appeal Court?s judgment for further appeal proceedings.The SEC on August 5, 2004 had filed a criminal complaint on this case with the

into the communication records of {A} and her client and found that {A} had been authorized by her client to make derivatives trading decisions with high trading volumes. The client asked her to close

client.Following the report of DBS Vickers Securities (Thailand) Company Ltd., and a client complaint, the SEC probed into {A}'s case and found that she had been authorized by her client to make securities trading

Kasikorn Securities Plc., the SEC probed into {A}'s case and found certain communication record, which he later admitted, indicating that he had been authorized by his client to make securities trading

Capital Nomura Securities PLC., a number of securities trading orders from an account of {A}'s client had no supporting evidence for a period of time. {A} admitted to Capital Nomura Securities PLC., that he

Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC probed into the case and found that {A} had sold 711,300 {X1} shares in a trading account of a juristic person where he is an authorized director and holds 99.98

orders sent through him for several days. {A} admitted that the securities trading orders were taken via mobile phone; the misconduct of which he had previously committed. In case of {B}, the SEC found

financial benefits from trading derivatives on non-public information concerning JAS, i.e., dividend payment for the year 2015 and a repurchase scheme at the beginning of the following year, which he had