in contravention of Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535(1992), in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code

misconduct in violation of Section 170 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992)  (SEA) was dishonest duty performance that caused damage to the company or created a benefit for himself, as specified

undertaking of securities business without having obtained a license under Section 90 and subject to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange act B.E. 2535 (1992), namely an imprisonment

director and CEO of Zipmex Thailand at the time, acted in a manner liable to be an offense under Section 82 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). Furthermore, the fact that

failure to comply with, Section 26 and is liable to criminal sanction under Section 66 of the Digital Asset Businesses Emergency Decree, i.e., imprisonment for a term of two to five years and a fine of

Department of Special Investigation (DSI) for further legal proceedings.Their actions were in contravention of the first paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 of the Securities and

report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated

gather information in a case of using inside information to purchase shares of a listed company in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). {A}, a financial advisor

derivatives products to deposit money into banking accounts of two securities companies for Sureerat?s derivatives trading account. Such wrongdoing was in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E

Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions therefore were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000