Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.312 315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case
classify income as follows Unit : million baht Service For three months until end of December 31 For three months until end of December 31 Increase / (Decrease) Percentage Sea Freight 610.64 635.03 -24.39
LIMITED ASIA SERMKIJ LEASING PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN INSULATORS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN MARINE SERVICES PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN PHYTOCEUTICALS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN SEA CORPORATION