selling price which can compensate the effect of higher cost per unit in Q1 2018. Combined gross profit margin of bottle energy drink,non-carbonated can and carbonated can energy drink. As mentioned above
from 36.4% of last year due to higher average selling price which can compensate the effect of higher cost per unit in Q1 2018. Combined gross profit margin of bottle energy drink,non-carbonated can and
from 36.4% of last year due to higher average selling price which can compensate the effect of higher cost per unit in Q1 2018. Combined gross profit margin of bottle energy drink,non-carbonated can and
708.7% yoy respectively. In correspondence to the group restructuring plan, the management has expected a stable or slightly growing Revenue over the next few years, considering an operational effect on
discount since the demand and supply of biodiesel close to equilibrium. With deducting the effect of Stock Gain & NRV of THB 92 million, the Company had Adjusted EBITDA of THB 253 million, an increase of 18
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY In 1Q 2020, the Company has adopted the new financial reporting standards related to financial instruments and leases as aforementioned. The cumulative effect of initially applying these
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Since the beginning of 2020, the Company has adopted the new financial reporting standards related to financial instruments and leases. The cumulative effect of initially applying these
million baht in a consequence of lower advanced bookings during the period. Reimbursable maintenance expense: lower by 348.5 million baht, a decreasing amount was mainly due to cash received from
airline business slightly declined by 0.6 percent from highly intense competition which caused the average fare to drop by 6.0 percent, particularly in Indochina routes. This was a consequence of increasing
week respectively. In consequence, the route network development affected ASK growth at 9.7 percent compared with last year. International point-of-sales were our main target customers. The major