statements for the year 2002 and for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2003 and thus misled shareholders and investors about DAIDO?s true financial condition. The said actions were in contravention of Section 312 of
/Nor/Khor. 37/2553 re: Prohibited Characteristics of Personnel in Capital Market Business dated September 15, 2010. The actions were in violation of Clauses 23(2) and (3) and the prohibited
Operators dated September 15, 2010. The actions were in violation of Clause 23(2) and the prohibited characteristics of the personnel in the capital market business under Clause 31(1) of the Notification of
seller were deemed as failure to perform duties with honesty and to adhere to the professional ethics and standard of conducts for the capital market personnel. The said actions were in violation of Clause
, in accordance with the rules and procedures specified in the terms and conditions; (3) Approving related actions concerning the bond series, with details as follows: - Granting an
of the bond maturity date, an adjustment of the bond interest rate, a partial repayment of the principal, and the approval to enter into any agreements, arrangements, or related documents. Such actions
well as persons who have relationships or coordinated actions with others in a manner prescribed by the SEC (acting in concert).In addition, transitional provisions require business operators to review
prepared incorrect accounts with intention to deceive others about those fraudulent actions, violated Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and
the Board of Governors of the Stock Exchange of Thailand Re: Disclosure of Information and Other Acts of Listed Companies Concerning the Connected Transactions B.E. 2546 (as amended) Moreover, the