director and CEO of Zipmex Thailand at the time, acted in a manner liable to be an offense under Section 82 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). Furthermore, the fact that

(Public Organization) (TGO), and (2) rights under the contract for future revenue sharing of the projects under (1), in which case the land must be located in Thailand and at least is registered in the

digital asset investments, liable to be an offense under Section 40 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018).The case of Zipmex director and CEO Akalarp Yimwilai was an offense

without licenses, subject to commission of offenses under the governing laws. The relevant undertakings include soliciting or providing channels for people in Thailand to make investment with the foreign

contravention of Section 240 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), subject to the penalties under Paragraph 1 of Section 296 and Section 296/2 and the civil penalties under Section 317/4 and

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which carries penalties under Sections 296 and 296/2 of the same Act. Therefore, the SEC has filed the complaint against Mr. Boon Vanasin to the ECD for further

quorum requirement under the terms and conditions. Therefore, the company will re-convene the bondholders’ meeting electronically on 30 May 2025 at 14.00 hours to consider the following matters

Section 243(3), which carries penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2, as well as civil sanctions under Section 317/4 and Section 317/5 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The Civil

approval by the BOT to participate in the Programmable Payment Sandbox to provide services or proceed in the manner of MOP under the Sandbox; and                   (3)  Revising the Cryptocurrency List

mutual funds under management of the same asset management company only up to two tiers for general mutual funds may not be flexible enough.  The SEC has therefore revised the governing rules in this