dispose the subsidiary’s machines for debt repayment to the debenture creditor. Furthermore, the subsidiary company was sued as the defendant in black case no. Por 1430/2561 to Samut Sakhon Province Court
legal action against the Company as it may deemed necessary and appropriated including to enforce the repayment according to the court order as the debtor under the court judgement. On 5 November 2017
to this Notification]; (c) contacting with the scheme registrar on behalf of unitholders in Thailand; (6) properly providing any channel to settle the dispute by any other measure other than court
provided ed. The money placed at court was decreased by Baht 5.90 million because the plaintiff already received such amount and decreasing of deferred income tax asset by Baht 2.76 million because the
THB 62 million or 4.1% over the same period last year, in line with our growth in revenue from sale of goods, which was driven by the revenue earned from food court services. We also generate additional
purchase in the year 2019 at Baht 46.63 million, decreased Baht 3.98 million or 7.86% compared to Q4/2018 because company and subsidiaries had defaulted loan, On September 25, 2019, the Appeal Court has
capital market transaction as prescribed in Clause 26. Clause 24 Any of the following cases is prohibited characteristic of Group 1: (1) being under receivership by the court order or being a bankrupt; (2
is adjudged to be bankrupt by the Civil Court. Court ruling as of 18 November 2008. Black Case No. Lor.For. 5/1998. Red Case No. Lor.For. 5/1998. http://www.led.go.th/ (English Translation) Page 14 The
judgement of the Supreme Court announced on 26 June 2017, 2) Baht 401 million of tax assessment (including penalties and surcharges) for the year 2001- 2004. The Supreme Court announced the judgement on 23