in such a way that the receiver of the benefits from such trading is the same person. These offenses were in violation of Sections 243 and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in
POWER-P Plc. (POWER), for violating Sections 307, 311 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) by collusively falsifying POWER accounts worth totaling 34 million baht with
(SEA). The SEC will later work on details of regulations.2. LBDU licensees that submit orders for investment unit trading through members of the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) must comply with net
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed company, Chupong has also contravened Section 89/7 by failing to perform duties responsibly and honestly, which is liable to
aiders. In this regard, {A}, {B} and {C} were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed
report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated
Securities Exchange of Thailand Act B.E. 2517 (1974) and Sections 243 (1),(2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 91 of the Penal Code. They
the inside information were liable to violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535. Meanwhile, Somsak and Areeya, as aiders and abettors of Pittaya and Athueck, were in
and Section 313 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Although he compensated for damages incurred to RAM in December 2014, it was after the SEC's probe had revealed such