taking an unfair advantage of other persons in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992.In this case, the offender refused to enter

could influence the securities price to gain unfair benefit over other persons, liable to the offenses under Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and criminal penalties under

penalties and civil sanctions.  -------------------------------

the penalties under the second paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA, in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. The SEC has therefore filed the criminal complaint against the three offenders

company, {A} has also contravened Section 89/7 by failing to perform duties responsibly and honestly, which is liable to the penalties under the second paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA, in conjunction

also received benefits from other relevant acts. His action  was deemed a violation of Section 89/7 and subject to penalties prescribed in the second paragraph of Section 281/2, Section 307, Section 311

was consequently liable to the penalties as prescribed in the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA.  Since Nittimon had refused to enter the settlement process, the SEC filed the complaint with

Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions therefore were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000

he received together with penalties. The investigation also revealed that during the client made the request for selling of investment units, {A} was serving another client. Without making any contact

operating digital asset business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018) without license in contravention of Section 26, subject to penalties under Section 66 of