. Such activities were in violation of Section 244/3 (1) and (2), the presumption under Section 244/5 and Section 244/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with

subsidiaries. Both acts led to the three individuals gaining benefits at the total amount of 3,465.64 million baht. The acts of the three individuals above constituted offences under Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2

Division of the Royal Thai Police (ECD) for jointly operating the digital asset dealer business without license in violation of Section 26 and subject to the penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency

activities are liable to be an operation of digital asset exchange business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree, for which XT .COM has not obtained a license, in violation of Section 26, and subject to

operating the digital asset dealer business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses without license in violation of Section 26 and subject to the penalties under Section 66 of the

inquiry official later notified that the acts of the four offenders were not an offense under such Law and therefore returned the cases to the SEC for criminal fining under Section 317 of the SEA.

by Noppawan and Viroj who allowed their separate trading accounts to be used for the YCI transactions in exchange for compensation.The aforesaid offenses were in violation of Section 243 of the

^10000&ps=2&mm=100&qf=title_th_default&fq=system_name%3AEnforcement&start=0&rows=10 1 - 4 of 4 results Sort by: Relevance Date (Newest) Date (Oldest) Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated

also received benefits from other relevant acts. His action  was deemed a violation of Section 89/7 and subject to penalties prescribed in the second paragraph of Section 281/2, Section 307, Section 311

244/6 (as the case may be) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code to the ECD inquiry officials on 10 February 2023*  |The SEC’s