, showing strong liquidity position and financial stability. Debt to equity ratio was at 0.4 times. 2,819 3,149 1,965 99 (1,734) Beginning cash and cash equivalents (31 Dec 2019) Net cash from operating
(x) 0.2 0.2 Interest bearing debt to EBITDA(x) 2.3 2.1 Notes: Current Ratio(Times) = Current assets divided by current liabilities EBITDA to sales revenue (%) = EBITDA divided by sales revenue Net
. Quick Ratio (x) 3.97 5.10 (1.13) Return on Equity (%) 12.70 14.53 (1.83) The lower ROE was a result of lower net profit for 1H17. Debt-to-Equity Ratio (x) 0.08 0.09 (0.01) The lower D/E ratio was a result
financing cost at the end of 2019 stood at 2.91% Net debt to equity ratio stood at 0.37x Capital Structure As of December 31, 2019, the Company reported total interest-bearing debt of THB 33,210 mn, an
ภาษีเงินได้ ค่าเสื่อมราคา และค่าตัดจำหนา่ย (Interest Bearing Debt to EBITDA Ratio) (เท่า) หนี้สินทั้งหมดที่มีภาระดอกเบี้ย กำไรก่อนหักดอกเบี้ย ภาษ ีค่าเสื่อมราคาและค่าตดัจำหน่าย (4) ความสามารถในการ ชำระ
l ine (US$ bil l ions) 1.4 1.3 Financial Ratios Current ratios (times) 1.3 1.3 Debt Servicing Coverage Ratio (DSCR) times 2.5 2.9 Interest coverage ratio (times) 8.3 6.7 Note (1) Net debt after debt
/DB) was as well widened, affecting crude cost to adjust upwards. From the rise in average crude oil price during this quarter there was an inventory gain of THB 450 million, and a gain from oil hedging
in the market. As a result, the Company’s cost of raw materials cannot adjust to the market price continuously decline in time. Even though, the government has imposed the urgent measures to absorb
, the growth in expenses was less pronounced than that of net total income. As a result, our cost to income ratio decreased to 41.07 percent compared to the previous quarter, which was still better than
proportion of sale revenue. 4. Administrative expenses For the year end of 2019, the administration expenses was 56.34 million baht or 13.85% from revenue compare to 60.75 million baht or 15.60% last year