POWER-P Plc. (POWER), for violating Sections 307, 311 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) by collusively falsifying POWER accounts worth totaling 34 million baht with

of exchange issued, accepted or avaled by or drawn on financial institution will no longer be exempted but will be defined and regulated as securities under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535

violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. As they declined to enter the settlement

recently approved regulations on municipal bond offerings by public sector organizations under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The regulations, to be effective on January 1, 2015, will

which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under

report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated

gather information in a case of using inside information to purchase shares of a listed company in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). {A}, a financial advisor

case and found that the aforesaid persons jointly operated securities business without a license in violation of Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). The said actions were

to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. He was subject to a criminal fine penalty. Given that the benefit he had received was lower than the minimum fine of

the inside information were liable to violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535. Meanwhile, Somsak and Areeya, as aiders and abettors of Pittaya and Athueck, were in