ธันวาคม 2559 โดยมาตรา 317/1 กำหนดให้การกระทำความผิดอาญาตามบทบัญญัติกฎหมายดังกล่าวดำเนินมาตรการลงโทษทางแพ่งกับผู้กระทำความผิดได้อ่านรายละเอียด “การดำเนินมาตรการลงโทษทางแพ่ง (Civil Sanctions)” ได้ที่ https

. The activities were liable to violate Section 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties

Section 83 of the Criminal Code, as the case may be, and subject to the penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1 and Section 296/2 of the SEA.The SEC has therefore filed the criminal complaint against

undertaking of securities business without having obtained a license under Section 90 and subject to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange act B.E. 2535 (1992), namely an imprisonment

the above case, liable to the same penalties under Section 94 in conjunction with Section 40 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018).The SEC has therefore filed the

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which carries penalties under Sections 296 and 296/2 of the same Act. Therefore, the SEC has filed the complaint against Mr. Boon Vanasin to the ECD for further

any action liable to be an offense under the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses, it may be subject to legal action with penalties of imprisonment and fine. In the case where the action is

provide services related to digital asset trading, exchange, depository, transfer, withdrawal or any transactions related to digital assets. Violators may be liable to penalties under the law.  The list of

penalties under Section 57 and Section 66 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The first count of unlicensed offering of digital tokens is liable to imprisonment for a term not

Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) which states that no person shall undertake securities business without license. Violator of Section 90 is subject to penalties under