for compensation of damage for one year, at the total amount of 1.75 billion baht, or in case of failure to claim for damages from the seller, MACO Board of Directors views that Hello Bangkok Holding

committing misconduct. {B}’s act was deemed a failure to comply with the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board.** SEC has therefore prohibited {B} from performing duties as branch manager in

, which was deemed a failure to comply with the investor’s order. {A}’s misconduct above contravened rules and regulations set forth in the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board.*  In

2018. Failure to proceed accordingly may subject IFEC directors or such persons to be in contravention of Section 89/7 of the SEA and a supporter to such offence.Concurrently, the SEC is inspecting the

the manager.The misconduct of the three persons above was a failure to perform duties with responsibility and professional due care for the best interest of investors pursuant to the Notification of the

with Section 83 of the Penal Code and Section 315 of the SEA (as the case may be). Moreover, Vijchu’s acts in particular, are deemed failure to perform duties as a private fund manager with honesty and

-disclosure of material facts that could influence investment decisions, failure of directors or executives of listed companies to perform fiduciary duties and using or allowing other persons to use a nominee

committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the punishment prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) for 18 counts of dishonest and failure to discharge his duty as director

client in replacement of {B}. Seeking benefits from the client during the performance of duties, trading securities on behalf of the client and failure to comply with KYC/CDD procedures were in violation

owners, in order to gain indirect benefits for himself. His actions are deemed as failure to honestly and fairly perform his duty in providing financial services, lacking of professional accountability or