statements for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order; the case was therefore deemed final. SEC Act

, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In this regard, Chupong, were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and

moratorium relief of Zipmex Group and to contact its clients deemed as creditors before 17.00 hours today in order for them to be eligible to attend the case conference in Singapore Court tomorrow. Zipmex

? accounts that he borrowed the money from, for other?s or his own benefits. The SEC reviewed and found that Chalerm?s actions were deemed fraudulent, deceitful, interference with clients? assets with the

affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 83 of the Penal

public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry

prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 18

and receive allocated shares for patrons of such companies. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.311, Section 315 and Section 89/7 in conjunction

allocated shares for patrons of such companies. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.311, Section 315 and Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 86

deemed a violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under