in breached of the joint venture agreement and the Company has therefore exercised its right under the agreement to notify the termination of Saraburi’s responsibilities in the NWR-SBCC Joint Venture
% interest. As a result of the final receivership order issued by the Court, Saraburi is considered to be in breached of the joint venture agreement and the Company has therefore exercised its right under the
(“EGAT”), with both venture partners having a 50% interest. As a result of the final receivership order issued by the Court, Saraburi is considered to be in breached of the joint venture agreement and the
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (“EGAT”), with both venture partners having a 50% interest. As a result of the final receivership order issued by the Court, Saraburi is considered to be in breached
of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the
, Saraburi is considered to be in breached of the joint venture agreement and the Company has therefore exercised its right under the agreement to notify the termination of Saraburi’s responsibilities in the
Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
issued by the Court, Saraburi is considered to be in breached of the joint venture agreement and the Company has therefore exercised its right under the agreement to notify the termination of Saraburi’s
considered to be in breached of the joint venture agreement and the Company has therefore exercised its right under the agreement to notify the termination of Saraburi’s responsibilities in the NWR-SBCC Joint
memorandum for the exclusive mobile phone project. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company hadn’t breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in