approvals and banned them from re-entering the industry for the total of two years, starting from June 30, 2016. ------------------------ Notes: 1. {X1} Securities (Thailand) Co., Ltd. can still operate

therefore suspended the approval of {A} as a securities investment consultant and banned her from performing duties as a branch manager in business related to capital market for four months, starting from 6

, filed a criminal complaint with the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) for further legal proceedings. As a result, Surasak is deeemed to possess untrustworthy characteristics and therefore banned

January 18, 2012. The SEC therefore revoked their approval and banned {A} to re-entry into the industry for two years while {B} was barred for one year and one month. {C} case was reported by MTS Gold

the director and executive of issuing and listed companies1 and is therefore banned from holding such positions.    ____________________ 1 Clause 3(1) in conjunction with Clause 4(3) and (6) of the

. Tor Lor Thor. 8/2557, as amended, the person in (2) was thus banned from working as a branch manager responsible for capital market business at the bank throughout the suspension period of the

individuals are banned from engaging in or associating with any securities or derivatives business firm and their registrations with the SEC as securities business personnel have been revoked.  The findings in

her approval and banned her re-entry into the industry for two years.Also reported by his employer Bualuang Securities PLC, the SEC probed into {B} case and found that {B} had been entrusted to trade

were effective as from October 5, 2013. {A} and {B} were banned from holding any securities company management position while approval for investment consultant of {C}, {D}, {E}, {F}, and {G} were

professional due care, as follows: (1) being under receivership by the court’s order; (2)1 being banned by the Stock Exchange from performing the position of executive or person who has the controlling power of