the ZipUp+ program, while the SEC was collecting and examining facts related to the business operation of Zipmex.   Following the collection and examination of the facts aforementioned, the Competent

}. However, after fact examination, it was found that there was a reasonable ground to believe that the actual payment for the purchase of the land and the office building was 40 million baht, and the

working for Asia Plus Securities Co., Ltd. at the time of misconduct.Following the inspection report submitted by Asia Plus Securities and the subsequent examination conducted by the SEC, it was found that

trading decisions for the client. From examination of communications records, there was no sources of the orders; just transaction confirmations made by such investment consultant and the conversations

for such trading was made from the client account by {A} without the knowledge of the client.The {B} case was also lodged by an investor. The SEC's finding from an examination of conversation records

; assets to SEC with information that did not align with the facts found by the SEC's examination. This resulted in the consideration that Mr. Akalarp committed or permitted Zipmex Thailand to make

employees who worked for an uninterrupted period of twenty years or more and their employment were terminated due to retirement. This caused a onetime expense in the amount of THB 39.60 million in Q2 2019. As

service cost as an expense in statement of comprehensive income due to the recognition of additional legal severance pay rates for employees who have worked for an uninterrupted period of twenty years or

public by such securities companies and derivatives broker. In this regard, the SEC Thailand assumes no responsibility for verification, examination or certification of completeness, accuracy and update of

information recording system with respect to derivatives trading, especially pre-trade information and post-trade information in order to support monitoring and examination after derivatives trading (audit