Bangkok, February 17, 2011 ? The Settlement Committee imposed a total fine of 1,185,785.60 baht on Chutchapong Munchupa, former executive of Solution Corner (1998) Plc. (SLC) for using undisclosed information he had obtained by virtue of his positions to sell SLC shares and for imparting a false statement with the intention to mislead any person concerning facts sensitive to the SLC share price. Following a referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), the SEC probed into the case and foun...
abstention shall remain until such information has been publicly disclosed. Otherwise, it shall be regarded as using inside information in such as way as to take advantage of other persons or insider trading
Bangkok, March 13, 2015 ? The SEC filed a criminal complaint with the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) against Yongyuth Ngamkaiwan and Vorapin Ngamkaiwan for using inside information to sell Thai Unique Coil Center Plc. (TUCC) shares. The filing of criminal complaint resulted from their failure to pay the fines imposed by the Settlement Committee, causing the criminal case to be unsettled.In this case, the SEC?s probe found that Yongyuth and Vorapin had sold TUCC shares in such a way th...
securities. Otherwise, the SEC will strictly pursue legal action against such wrongdoing as insider trading deteriorates investors? trust as well as confidence in the capital market.?
Bangkok, March 16, 2016 ? The Criminal Fining Committee has imposed a total fine of 25,322,064.39 on four offenders for using insider information to purchase ordinary shares and warrants of Siam
The Civil Sanction Committee passed a resolution imposing a civil sanction on Surasak and Ekkamon in the case of insider trading of GLOBAL shares on 22 August 2012; however, both persons refused to
said: “This is an insider trading case proceeded under civil sanction, filed with the Civil Court on 27 December 2018 and the Appeal Court passed the final rulings on 22 December 2020. If the defendant
pay an equal civil penalty of 333,333.33 baht. In addition, since the offenses in this case are related to unfair trading activity, which is a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E
subject to pay an equal civil penalty of 333,333.33 baht. In addition, since the offenses in this case are related to unfair trading activity, which is a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering