subject to penalties under Section 296, Section 296/2, as well as civil sanctions under Section 317/4 and Section 317/5 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA);       (2) Mrs. Teo Lee Ngo

perform duties honestly under Section 89/7 and thus subject to the penalties under Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2, Section 307, Section 308, Section 311 and Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E

commission of offense under Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which was effective at the time of the offenses. Currently, the

(1), in conjunction with Section 243(1), subject to penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The actions of Mrs. Phanida, Miss Thitirat

. The activities were liable to violate Section 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties

Section 83 of the Criminal Code, as the case may be, and subject to the penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1 and Section 296/2 of the SEA.The SEC has therefore filed the criminal complaint against

undertaking of securities business without having obtained a license under Section 90 and subject to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange act B.E. 2535 (1992), namely an imprisonment

the Civil Sanction Committee. The civil monetary penalties totalled 1,567.70 million baht and the compensations for the benefits received or should have been received totalled 194.32 million baht. The

the above case, liable to the same penalties under Section 94 in conjunction with Section 40 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018).The SEC has therefore filed the

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which carries penalties under Sections 296 and 296/2 of the same Act. Therefore, the SEC has filed the complaint against Mr. Boon Vanasin to the ECD for further