Laksana and Sommart in this case is deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code which is subject to

the share price of RASA was in violation of Section 238 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA). He agreed to enter the fining process. The

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a fine on him in the amount of 48,127,389.54 baht. As aider and abettor,  Pathaipoom and Chalalai were deemed to

and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be.  The said actions also caused damages to the company but

 75.78 mil ncreasing t ers of the Co d 49.52 mill he reason w ng Performa ge Commiss ative financ e company, 017 operat ear 2017 wa  sales incre with Q2 year ling expens 7 was 356.7 lion baht or he product

the year 2023 and the third quarter of 2024 submited by the company in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) do not contain amended information related to the aforesaid

. The activities were liable to violate Section 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties

. Such activities were in violation of Section 244/3 (1) and (2), the presumption under Section 244/5 and Section 244/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with

, and securities depository center in accordance with Section 206 and Section 222 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).* The Meeting also approved the principles for amending the

After STARK had failed to prepare and submit its financial statements for the year 2022 within the specified period as required by law, the SEC, by virtue of Section 58 of the SEA, instructed the