business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court

penalties under Section 272 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (“Securities and Exchange Act”). SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with 46 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 3/2026 Settlement Committee

Information Transmission System. Such misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which was effective at the

shall be deemed as an integral part of the commitment; (3) authority, duties and responsibilities of the management company; (4) rights, duties and responsibilities of the unitholders; (5) restrictions on

exchange business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree, for which OKX has not obtained a license, in violation of Section 26, and subject to offenses and penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency

is considered a violation of Section 26, resulting in an offense liable to the penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses. The actions of Arrom and Natach are deemed

operated without any license and is considered a violation of Section 26, resulting in an offense liable to the penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses. The actions of

of the Filing Form, effective 9 October 2023. As a result, the aforesaid persons are liable to the penalties under Section 300, in conjunction with Section 278 of the SEA;     2. Submitting the minutes

the inside information of NOBLE to Kongpat while knowing or possessing such inside information was deemed a violation of Section 242(2) in conjunction with Section 243(1), and liable to the penalties

return to the unitholders after the inside information was disclosed.Chanyarat’s and Eakarat’s acts were liable to be the offenses under Section 241 and subject to the penalties under Section 296 of the