9,073 -2% EBITDA 137 228 -40% 211 -35% 348 540 -36% EBITDA Margin (%) 3.2% 4.7% -1.5% 4.6% -1.4% 3.9% 6.0% -2.1% Stock Gain/(Loss) & NRV -149 -425 -65% -233 -36% -382 -458 -17% Adjusted EBITDA(1) 286 653
increased tourist-related usage during the festive period in April and May. Competition shifted towards value-based offerings with more personalized packages to gain ARPU. The handset market slowed down in
the second rank, and continues to consistently thrive with the cumulative market share of 2018 at 15.8%. Net marketing margin was within proximity of 2017 levels, although was affected by the
acquisition is a strategic step for MACO to gain control over PBSB, enabling us to maximise the selling capacity of PBSB’s network and develop marketing channels in oversea markets efficiently. This transaction
Net profit margin (%) 17.6% -14.8% -16.3% 1 Restated according to Purchase Price Allocation report of Vienna House and EBT of UE 2 Exclude foreign exchange gain/(loss) and impairments U City reported
% (24.7) N.A. Finance cost 132.5 254.8 (48.0)% 458.2 (71.1)% Reported Net Profit/Loss (387.5) (880.5) (56.0)% (253.7) (52.8)% Recurring Net Proft/Loss* 10.5 (63.7) N.A. (253.7) N.A. GOP margin (%) 63.4
of service and SG&A. As a result of demand weakness, EBITDA in 1Q22 dropped -0.8% YoY and -2.3% QoQ to Bt22,404mn with a margin of 49.5%. Following declined EBITDA, AIS reported a net profit of
at a higher rate than the decreased rate in revenue. Mostly because the projects’ gross margin in 2022 is slightly higher than in 2021. In addition, in 2022, the situation of the COVID- 19 epidemic
consolidated gross profit in 3Q2017 was THB 795.27 million, improved by THB 46.82 million or 6.26% up from 3Q2016. The consolidated gross profit margin contributed of 18.08% in 3Q2017, increased from 16.97% in