and Kitha was not qualified to be a listed company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Their divided duties were meticulously planned, Mr. Aphichat involved in introducing Mr. Boonpiam Eamroongroj to Mr

remuneration such as Clubhouse application, Line group and Facebook without obtaining license from the SEC by in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions

online platforms such as Facebook without obtaining license from the SEC by in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case

granted as well as signing cheques which were handed to four borrowers. Her abovementioned failure was considered a contravention of Sections 89/7 and 89/24 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act B.E

financial statements for the year 2013 and the annual registration statement for the year 2013 (Form 56-1) to the SEC Office and the Stock Exchange of Thailand within the period specified in the notification

advice and management for the clients. The aforesaid person jointly operated securities business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992

, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.90

SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest

securities business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. The public prosecutor issued

Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. This case is in the process of inquiry by the prosecutor official. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 02/03/2016