’ meeting has considered and given opinion that the connected transaction is reasonable and beneficial to the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary will receive the remuneration. The Audit Committee’s opinion : They
2016, result in the transport of goods, the customer has less and less in the 1st quarter because they could not find enough container customers' needs across multiple paths. The situation improved in
transaction is justified and will benefit the Company. Therefore they resolved to approve the said transaction. 7. Opinion of the Audit Committee and/or the Company's directors that is different from the
that have invested or held equity instruments issued by PTT Public Company Limited. In order to protect the investors’ interest and legitimate right and ensure that they are treated fairly, it is
they are neither inconsistent with nor contrary to the provisions of this Notification until notifications, orders and circulars issued under or prescribing guidelines in compliance with this
they are neither inconsistent with nor contrary to the provisions of this Notification until notifications, orders and circulars issued under or prescribing guidelines in compliance with this
they are neither inconsistent with nor contrary to the provisions of this Notification until notifications, orders and circulars issued under or prescribing guidelines in compliance with this
Thananan-narapool 3. Mr.Achawin Asavabhokin who have the interests did not attend the meeting and they had no voting right in this agenda. Board of Directors’ Opinion : The Board of Directors meeting has
Sunthornchitcharoen 2. Mr.Adisorn Thananan-narapool 3. Mr.Achawin Asavabhokin who have the interests did not attend the meeting and they had no voting right in this agenda. Board of Directors’ Opinion : The Board of
to manage SUTG by themselves again after they found out that the RDF projects was delay and have lose some projects to other companies which do not use innovation channel. It might make more risk in