affect the shareholders’ rights, benefits and decisions significantly, the SEC, by virtue of Section 58 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), has ordered OTO’s BOD to make
and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), instructs NUSA to clarify the following information: 1. The impact of the lawsuits filed with the Civil Court by NUSA’s shareholders on petition for
B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He earlier agreed to enter the settlement procedure; but later declined to do so. The criminal case has not been regarded as settled. As a result, the SEC has to file the
Bangkok, March 22, 2016 ? The SEC is seeking public comments on the proposals to amend several provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535 (1992) and the Provident Fund (PVD) Act
conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) as follows:? Sagha Sakulekpaisan or ?Here-Tee? (former name: Chakchai or Thana Sae Jiem) was convicted on three counts with one-year
)(5) and Section 244/6(3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) (as applicable), and Section 83 of the Criminal Code, and are subject to penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1
work systems were in violation of Section 113 and the company was subject to the penalties under Section 282 of the SEA. As a result, the Settlement Committee imposed the fine of 1,101,000 baht on AEC
inappropriate and illegal actions by its employees. The aforesaid defects of AEC work systems were in violation of Section 113 and the company was subject to the penalties under Section 282 of the SEA. As a
and 6.9% QoQ, making the revenue contribution grew to 4.2% of AIS core service revenue. Robust core service revenue growth (Pre-TFRS 15) with guidance maintained Core service revenue (pre-TFRS) in 3Q19