were made in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to {X1} Company share price. The information, of which they learnt as {X1} Company directors, was about

trustworthy and recognized among listed companies and bring about closer collaboration which will be beneficial to investors, listed companies and capital market?, said Mr. Vorapol.

any persons about the company’s financial position. - This case is under consideration of the supreme court. - The Attorney-General issued a supplementary prosecution order according to the

the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr

performance. Furthermore, Merkle did not disclose information about the advertiser and the relationship or connection between individuals playing a key role in the advertisement and the advertiser. DAB Act S

2022. However, on March 31, 2023, ALL submitted the form 56-1 One Report for the year 2022 without disclosing information about these disputes. Instead, it stated that “The company has no legal disputes

One Report for the year 2022 without disclosing information about these disputes. Instead, it stated that “The company has no legal disputes that may cause damage to the group’s assets exceeding five

actions misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions This case is in the process of

actions misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of

misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of inquiry