SEC?s subsequent investigation revealed that during the aforesaid period FOCUS shares were traded in great volume and the share price changed inconsistently with normal market conditions because the
, inflating and stabilizing the share price as well as matching orders within the group which caused TYM share price inconsistent with normal market conditions to mislead the general public about TYM shares
another person. Then, the shares were resold to ZMICO at 19.75 baht per share which was not the normal market price. Later, the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order and filed a lawsuit against
caused TYM share price inconsistent with normal market conditions to mislead the general public about TYM trading values and volumes and lure the general public to trade such shares.Their actions were
trading period to be inconsistent with normal market conditions to mislead other persons that CHUO shares were in high demand at the time and lure them to trade such shares accordingly. His offense was in
the trading volume of such shares on a large scale. In addition, several trading orders were matched within the same group, causing the PYLON trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition
normal market condition became affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013.Such offences were in violation of Section 243 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83
trading values and volumes to be inconsistency with normal market condition to mislead and lure the general public into such trading and were therefore in violation of Section 243(2) of the Securities and
; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width
orders or trading securities on a continued basis with an intent to cause the price or the volume of such securities trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. The said persons cooperated