be authorized to perform any actions related to the disposal of Land and Buildings to NML, including to sign and negotiate terms and other details in land and buildings sale and purchase agreement

12.3% Revenue from finance lease under power purchase agreement 103.2 101.6 104.9 3.2% 1.6% 306.9 305.7 (0.4%) Revenue from construction under a concession arrangement 215.0 - - - N.A.(

2.8% Revenue from finance lease under power purchase agreement 95.3 102.4 104.5 2.1% 9.7% 197.6 206.9 4.7% Cost of sales and services (1,174.0) (1,274.4) (1,191.7) (6.5%) 1.5% (2,323.4) (2,466.2) 6.1

% 4,669.2 4,458.3 (4.5%) Revenue from finance lease under a Power Purchase Agreement 105.2 106.3 102.8 (3.3%) (2.3%) 312.1 314.0 0.6% Cost of sales and services (1,168.7) (1,168.5) (1,272.2) 8.9% 8.9

1,139.5 1,182.8 1,148.4 (34.4) (2.9%) 4,540.2 4,586.4 46.2 1.0% Revenue from finance lease under power purchase agreement 100.9 102.8 103.2 94.3 (8.9) (8.6%) 410.4 401.2 (9.2) (2.2%) Revenue from

40.32 percent, which was better than the target. Meanwhile, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As evidenced, the

marginally from the previous quarter to 40.70 percent, it was better than the target. Meanwhile, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s

capital position was robust. As evidenced, capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of KASIKORNBANK FINANCIAL CONGLOMERATE (the Conglomerate) according to the Basel III Accord was 18.12 percent, with a Tier 1 capital

dropped from the same period of last year. At the same time, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As evidenced, capital

Company’s liquidity problem and inability to repay a large amount of debt. Through the years, the Company engaged in several debt restructurings, as in 2010, where the Company entered into an agreement for