cash or transferred the money to the juristic person claimed to be an agent from Hong Kong SAR or through currency exchange company in Thailand.According to the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), any
the purpose of law enforcement according to the authority of the three agencies. This includes executing the case with the fined person in a criminal case in order to effectively seize property or
concealing the identity of the person who was the real user of those accounts.Pattanapong?s action was deemed to be in violation of Section 243 (1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the
of directors and executives of a securities company; (2) “Investor Contact” means any person who has duties to contact, solicit, advise or prepare a plan of trading or investment in securities for
executives of a securities company; (2) “Investor Contact” means any person who has duties to contact, solicit, advise or prepare a plan of trading or investment in securities for investors, and are divided
considering which act of the person giving advice or the owner of the website or electronic media is or is not liable to be an undertaking of securities business in the category of investment advisory or an
those applied to person who works in securities business; (3) added clarity on the protection that investors will receive in case of the bankruptcy of the securities depository center as well
in such a way that the receiver of the benefits from such trading is the same person. These offenses were in violation of Sections 243 and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in