, Pongsachalerm and Chaiwat?s actions were deemed using inside information to gain unfair benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 and thus liable to
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and thus liable to penalties under Section 296 of the said Act. As the aiders, Ratchanee, Krisda, and Preecha are subject to penalties under Section 296 of the Act in
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed company, Chupong has also contravened Section 89/7 by failing to perform duties responsibly and honestly, which is liable to
company, {A} has also contravened Section 89/7 by failing to perform duties responsibly and honestly, which is liable to the penalties under the second paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA, in conjunction
February 2014 before the information became publicly known on 28 February 2014. Such action was deemed taking an unfair advantage of other people.Chai?s misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable
the inside information were liable to violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535. Meanwhile, Somsak and Areeya, as aiders and abettors of Pittaya and Athueck, were in
was consequently liable to the penalties as prescribed in the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA. Since Nittimon had refused to enter the settlement process, the SEC filed the complaint with
. 2546 (2003) and liable to punishments under Section 125 of the said Act, namely up to three years? imprisonment or up to 300,000 baht fine or both, and a daily fine of 10,000 baht throughout the period
Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions therefore were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000
Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) and thus liable under Section 125 of the same Act to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand baht or both and a further